So I made a swipe at the Royal baby, I'm sorry.
Not because I am not still frustrated by the inequality that is being rubbed in my face.
But because of the cover of Elle and a comment from another woman.
Picking us apart
The first thing I clocked when I picked up this £4 glossy was one line.
Why you are still single.
My response, how dare you charge me to destroy me.
The woman trap
I seek to be a self-assured, kind and loving person, but honestly what chance do any of us have against all this rubbish.
10 ways to lose your pregnancy fat.
10 reasons guys don't like you.
10 reasons why you're really down by now.
I will never measure up
Just a thought: maybe it's all this self-esteem draining rubbish that you are throwing at me.
Then, on the same day a woman remarks on me looking good with: "You make me sick."
My inner voice wanted to scream at her that I wasn't as self assured as she thought.
Then I thought of Kate
This made me think of Ms Middleton, she may appear to have it all.
But she is being barraged by the same rubbish that seems to turn even the sanest and most amazing of women against each other.
So, I won't be sending flowers to this woman that I don't know, but I will wish her child the best of health and encourage her to eat as much chocolate as she pleases, until she feels like she wants to go to the gym.
Showing posts with label Kate Middleton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kate Middleton. Show all posts
Thursday, 25 July 2013
Monday, 22 July 2013
Shock, a baby!
So that woman, that famous royal pregnant one, well she's had a baby and it's a male heir.
The BBC of course are all over the affair.
Royal love in
There are levels of sycophantic behaviour that seem embarrassing for trained media professionals.
Births are great, but I can't help be irritated that this very rich very able woman is being raved about, as every day people are losing all they have to support their much less well-off families.
The country has no money, but let's have a media circus around a woman who will probably never be out of clothes and toys for a potential King of this beleaguered land.
Witchcraft
My naughty muscle is thinking quietly, full moon on the night of the birth, werewolf in the making...
Now that would be a King to be in awe of, turns into a wolf once a month and goes raving round London in the style of An American Werewolf in London.
Sorry, that was my first thought when I clocked the moon.
The BBC of course are all over the affair.
Royal love in
There are levels of sycophantic behaviour that seem embarrassing for trained media professionals.
Births are great, but I can't help be irritated that this very rich very able woman is being raved about, as every day people are losing all they have to support their much less well-off families.
The country has no money, but let's have a media circus around a woman who will probably never be out of clothes and toys for a potential King of this beleaguered land.
Witchcraft
My naughty muscle is thinking quietly, full moon on the night of the birth, werewolf in the making...
Now that would be a King to be in awe of, turns into a wolf once a month and goes raving round London in the style of An American Werewolf in London.
Sorry, that was my first thought when I clocked the moon.
Labels:
Duchess of Cambridge,
Kate Middleton,
King,
moon,
rich women,
Royal baby,
Werewolf
Saturday, 15 September 2012
Shocking pictures of royalty
Er, these pictures of Miss Kate Middleton...
I haven't seen them.
Probably because:
The Sun said they were "grossly intrusive pictures that no decent British paper would touch with a bargepole". (Drawn from msn.com)
A little strange that the paper happy to print ladies with bare breasts on the third page, every day, should say this.
Pondering
I guess I should start reading all the papers and pondering and purring and pronouncing more regularly, but no one gives a damn anyway, so...
The idea of intrusion is a weird one.
I've just been listening to Ian Hislop on the radio talking about privacy.
I think he thinks that privacy is only there for the powerful and having read some law text books on the subject and the costs involved I think he might well be right.
Protecting everyone
However, protecting them does in some small way also protect us, because it gives rise to a cultural conversation.
Asking whether people should have been taking these pictures of Kate Middleton and whether other people should have subsequently printed them does I think make us look at our own moral values and how we treat people that don't have the money to sue us.
We should be asking these questions and we should be thinking about it.
I still don't think that we should be naming and shaming people for anti-social behaviour when that definition seems to touch upon behaviour that I just don't think are anti-social.
Big leap I know, but worth thinking about.
I haven't seen them.
Probably because:
The Sun said they were "grossly intrusive pictures that no decent British paper would touch with a bargepole". (Drawn from msn.com)
A little strange that the paper happy to print ladies with bare breasts on the third page, every day, should say this.
Pondering
I guess I should start reading all the papers and pondering and purring and pronouncing more regularly, but no one gives a damn anyway, so...
The idea of intrusion is a weird one.
I've just been listening to Ian Hislop on the radio talking about privacy.
I think he thinks that privacy is only there for the powerful and having read some law text books on the subject and the costs involved I think he might well be right.
Protecting everyone
However, protecting them does in some small way also protect us, because it gives rise to a cultural conversation.
Asking whether people should have been taking these pictures of Kate Middleton and whether other people should have subsequently printed them does I think make us look at our own moral values and how we treat people that don't have the money to sue us.
We should be asking these questions and we should be thinking about it.
I still don't think that we should be naming and shaming people for anti-social behaviour when that definition seems to touch upon behaviour that I just don't think are anti-social.
Big leap I know, but worth thinking about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)